Archive for the ‘Telecommuting for Business Continuity’ Category

Washington DC forced to close- Teleworkers asked to maintain operations

Monday, December 21st, 2009

The worst snow storm in Washington DC in 70 years has just blanketed the Metorpolitan area with over 2 ft. of snow! This has forced all Federal Agencies to close http://bit.ly/7hcVEH
while the city digs out. And what about the Teleworkers? They are working hard to sustain operations.

A notice was sent out alerting Teleworkers that they are still expected to work and keep government functions operational. The last time the city was shut down do to weather was 2003, 6 years ago. No doubt, the explosion of home broadband access is allowing thousands of workers to access government networks securely and keep their vital tasks fully up and running.

The big question is, “How many more workers could be working if management was more supportive?” Telework has been a big battle in the Capitol City. There are many government mandates stating that a certain percentage of workers must be allowed to work remotely, largely for today’s example. But, many senior leaders are still mired in the work methods and measurements of the past, “I have to see you in order to know that you are working.” Today’s economy is demanding more than just face time, It’s demanding results. The more that organizations can focus on results and enabling employees to work their best from anywhere, the more productive they will be and prepared when disaster strikes.

I’m confident there are businesses losing revenue today in the DC area simply because they waited until today to test their Telework/Remote Work plan. The majority of organizations who test remote work in the middle of a crisis fail. Take time to create a formal Remote Work policy and test it on a regular basis. For more information on what it takes to test a Remote Work Policy, please contact me directly.

Brandon Dempsey
SuiteCommute
1-888-878-4832
Brandon@SuiteCommute.com

H1N1 Swine Flu- Telecommuting/Telework answer to many employers

Thursday, April 30th, 2009

Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano has come out and just advised companies whose children’s schools have been affected to allow employees to work from home. It is generally recommended that any company whose employees have been near infected persons, traveled to infected countries, or feel they may be sick or have been exposed should have employees work from home for a minimum of 3 days. For instance, Monsanto a St. Louis based company, has advised its employees who have traveled to Mexico to work from home 5-7 days, before returning to work.

When allowing employees to work remotely consider what equipment, resources, and information they will need to complete their work. Managers should be informed immediately of the situation and advised in how to manage their remote employees. Employees should then be instructed in how they will obtain their work and/or submit it back to the office. Consider mapping out a process flow chart of how an employee’s work input and output flows through the organization. This will help if more become infected and critical positions need to be shifted to different workers.

Remote Work does not have to cost any additional money for the employer. Many employees are most likely willing to help defray the costs of them working remotely. Most corporate phone systems have the ability to forward calls to employee’s home lines, or cell phones. Additionally, employees could be asked to increase the bandwidth of their high speed internet connection or reformat their home computers to clean out all viruses and potential threats to work documents and information.

If you allow employees to work at home, you should have them complete a safety and security checklist to be certain that their workspace is compliant and not hazardous to their health. Additionally, employees should be taught how to avoid various technology invasions and breaches of security. A solid Human Resources’ policy accompanied with legal requirements and performance metrics will go a long way to ensure compliance and protect the company from frivolous lawsuits.

Got a unique question? Feel free to contact me directly.

Brandon Dempsey
SuiteCommute, LLC.
1-888-878-4832
Brandon@suitecommute.com

Telecommuting/Telework Keeps Texas County Working During Emergency

Wednesday, February 25th, 2009

Another great story of an organization maintaining operability during a disaster through Telecommuting- Harris County, Texas.

I just read an article on business continuity through telecommuting and remote work. In this article it discusses how the Harris County Employees were able to sustain vital operations during Hurricane Ike utilizing a Citrix remote application recovery system. While the technology worked well, what is important to note is, “For a disaster scenario, an event during which people are confused or dislocated, having an application they can log on to — versus some new virtual private network we’re trying to push out at the last minute and get people trained on — was critical.” This shows the need for training ahead of time.

Too many organizations simply believe that when disaster strikes everyone will just be able to hop on their laptops and get to work. NOT THE CASE. Systems have to be tested and employees trained in their response.

Quick Question- Does your Business Continuity Plan count on employees taking their computers home with them every night? If so, what percentage actually do?

If you are like the many other organizations that mandate this, but only have the average amount of employees following-15%. Will the right people be able to respond appropriately? Probably not.

Take it from the Red Cross Ready Rating program I spoke at today on Pandemic Planning.

  1. Make a Plan
  2. Train Employees
  3. Test Your Plan
  4. Refine and Repeat

For more information on the presentation I gave today or on Remote Work and Business Continuity Planning, contact me below.

Brandon Dempsey
1-888-878-4832
Brandon@suitecommute.com

Telecommuting: 5 Answers to Bad Weather?

Tuesday, December 23rd, 2008

With the US preparing for more weeks of bad weather, many employees are looking for ways to avoid it. The best alternative to driving in the bad weather is of course, telecommuting, but what other inherent benefits might an employer gain? Let’s take a look and maybe you can use some of these benefits to help further bolster your case to work remotely on bad weather days.

Reason #1 “Employee Safety”: Driving in hazardous conditions is not safe for anyone. Less cars on the road will lead to fewer accidents and fewer chances of your employees being injured on the way to or from work. Employers to highly value their employees’ safety are often times very willing to allow Telecommuting.

Reason #2 “Maintaining Operations”: Of course we know that when bad weather strikes, many employees dread the commute. The commute often times can be risky for employees and they may decide to just take a sick day instead of coming into work. Telecommuting allows an employer to maintain operations more efficiently when employees have the ability to work from home. In addition, the bad weather may totally prevent use of major highways and thoroughfares, in this instance, companies without Telecommuting arrangements have to shut down. Organizations with Telecommuting Programs are able to maintain their operations through the use of a distributed workforce. This is becoming more common in Business Continuity Plans, because companies are starting to see the value in having a network that can work anywhere.

Reason #3 “Retaining Top Talent”: Employers who allow their employees the flexibility to work remotely in during bad weather are seen as more flexible and are often times favored over employers who don’t offer such arrangements. When employees are considering a new job, one of the top questions asked, is often times concerning the employer’s stance on flexibility. Study after study has shown that employers who are more flexible simply have higher retention rates than those who are not.

Reason #4 “Presenteeism- Not good for Business”: The definition of Presenteeism is when employees who are sick and should stay home, feel guilty and come to work anyways. They generally infect a dozen other people and suddenly the “office-flu bug” is running rampant. Employees who have the ability to telecommute, can work from home, preventing the spread of their germs and remaining productive.

Reason #5 “The Children Factor”: Bad weather often times mean no school for kids; however, just because the schools are off doesn’t mean work is off. While many employees have to take sick days in order to stay home and watch their kids, Telecommuting enabled employees can stay home and complete their work. How far back does one employee missing put their team? For many teams, it takes a few days to get back on track, but remotely enable employees can remain productive and projects can remain on schedule.

As many of you have probably encountered bad weather days, consider allowing your employees to telecommute during these days and you will be sure to capitalize on some added benefits. Want to work remotely during bad weather days, but don’t know how to get started? Contact me directly and I will give you some great statistics and research to approach your manager or senior management.

Brandon Dempsey
SuiteCommute
1-888-878-4832
Brandon@suitecommute.com

Pandemic-Bird Flu spreading: Government Agencies Practice Response

Monday, November 17th, 2008

A new report was released today on a possible Bird Flu outbreak in Indonesia. To see the article click here. In this article it talks about a hospital that has admitted 17 patients, with the potential Bird Flu virus. While I cannot say whether the Bird Flu has made the jump to human-human transmission or not, I can say that business continuity and COOP planners should take notice. Pandemic planning has become a major part of many employer’s and the government’s continuity plans and the subject of a recent tabletop exercise I helped facilitate.

The instance in Indonesia supports the World Health Organization’s claim that a pandemic is coming. It is not a matter of “if”, but a matter of “when.” Unfortunately, the most likely strain of the next pandemic is the current “Bird Flu” strain H5N1, with a mortality rate near 80%. Because of this high mortality rate, governments worldwide are taking steps to prepare.

The exercise I helped to facilitate brought in 150 leaders from various federal and local government agencies for a one day pandemic planning exercise. During this exercise we broke up the participants into various groups and walked asked them about their current plans. The moderators, flown in from Washington D.C. and senior members of the Department of Homeland Security and FEMA, had “mock” videos created that simulated what “CNN” newscasts might look like. As the exercise continued over the course of the day, pandemic threat levels and transmission rates steadily rose.

The first outbreak started in Indonesia (coincidence?) and we discussed how the agencies would respond internally. It was discussed that first outbreak most likely would not be reported until weeks later, since many Indonesian and Asian governments are not fully cooperating or actively monitoring reports of the outbreak. The agencies at my table talked about how they would step up the “family preparedness” materials that were disseminated to their employees. They talked about increasing hand hygiene and trying to reassure employees.

The next phase, was a news reporter coming on “air” and talking about the spread of the flu from Indonesia to Japan, and what was happening in Japan. Still the agencies at my table talked about stepping up their employee’s personal preparedness and discussed limiting travel from their agency to Asian countries.

The third phase was rather interesting with a report claiming that a businessman, recently on a trip back from Japan, had passed through LA and then on to another city. The virus had now reached the US. The agencies at my table decided that this was the trigger they needed to enact their response plans. Sanitation efforts were stepped up and employees encouraged to wear personal protective equipment. Many agencies said that they did not currently have up to date Telecommuting Programs and that their fear was getting people to come to work, to work. Of course this is where we got into a rather deep conversation about what needed to be completed in order to prepare and discussed at great length the many facets of sustaining a workforce when a majority of them are working remotely.

The last 3 phases escalated the pandemic through all 5 phases of the pandemic. Employees were infected, many died, and the agencies were asked how they would respond to each of the different phases. This exercise forced many who had just been “writers” of their plan to test their plan against what experts predicted might happen.

What’s noteworthy here is that there is no “correct” response to any pandemic. What the participants walked away with was a better understanding of how to prepare and how their responses would be affected by other agencies’ responses. This last point, concerning inter-agency cooperation lies at the core of the entire exercise. The best way for the US to respond will take a coordinated response from Federal, State, and local governments combined with private businesses and families all working together to prevent the spread of a pandemic.

No Gas = Mandatory Telecommuting in Atlanta

Friday, September 26th, 2008

Well, the recent gas price now has Atlantans being forced to Telecommute, simply because they can’t buy gas!

I am down in Atlanta, visiting with clients and attending a large employment law conference this week and have spoke with numerous business people who are telling me that even after driving to over 14 gas stations, they still can’t buy gas! They say that the gas shortage has other employees in there offices being forced to Telecommute simply because they don’t have the gas to drive to and from the office.

This is amazing to me, because for the first time employers are faced with the challenge that no matter what, their employees really can’t get to work. It seems as though an almost miny-pandemic exercise is taking place here in Atlanta, where employers are now charged with the task of getting the work to their employees instead of vice-versa. From what I understand, from the people I spoke with, this poses a problem for some of their colleagues.

Colleagues main fears are that employees don’t always have the same access to information and work resources, as they do in the offfice. And because of this employees are rather limited in what they can do. In addition, many employees are logging into work networks through home computers and other means, simplpy as a last resort. This poses a lot of problems for employers if they aren’t careful.

I hope Atlanta employers are starting to see the need for formal Telecommuting programs. A city this large, notorious for bad traffic, has been needing wide scale implementation for a long time. Hopefully now, employees have another reason to bolster their cause. But for many, I’m sure the arguement will be “no gas = less traffic”.

Random Quote

Mr. Dempsey and the professionals at SuiteCommute are great at what they do. They consistently solve whatever problem is put in front of them and their technological expertise can’t be matched. If you need a telework solution, I highly recommend that you look at SuiteCommute. — Private for legal reasons

Monthly Newsletter
Sign up today

* required

*









Email Marketing by VerticalResponse
Subsribe to Blog

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner